In 2015, the Wachowskis, creators of the groundbreaking film The Matrix, released Jupiter Ascending, a science-fiction space opera with a budget estimated to be over $200 million. Despite high expectations and a star-studded cast, the film was a significant critical and commercial failure, earning only $183.9 million worldwide and receiving largely negative reviews from critics.
The movie, starring Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum, aimed to create a vast, original universe but struggled to connect with audiences. Critics pointed to a convoluted plot, underdeveloped characters, and lackluster performances as key factors in its poor reception, turning it into a notable example of a high-budget cinematic disappointment.
Key Takeaways
- Jupiter Ascending was directed by the Wachowskis, known for The Matrix trilogy.
- The film had a production budget reported to be between $176 million and $210 million.
- It was a box office failure, grossing approximately $183.9 million globally.
- The movie holds a 27% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, indicating widespread negative reviews from critics.
- While its visual effects were often praised, the story, dialogue, and character development were heavily criticized.
High Expectations from Acclaimed Directors
Following the monumental success and cultural impact of The Matrix, any project from the Wachowskis carried immense weight and expectation. Known for their ambitious world-building and philosophical themes, their return to the sci-fi genre with an original concept generated significant industry buzz. Jupiter Ascending was positioned as a grand space opera, a genre that requires both spectacular visuals and compelling storytelling to succeed.
The production was backed by a substantial budget, allowing for elaborate set pieces, intricate costume design, and cutting-edge special effects. The investment signaled a major gamble by the studio on the Wachowskis' unique vision. However, this large financial commitment also set a very high bar for commercial success, one that the film ultimately failed to meet.
The Post-Matrix Career of the Wachowskis
Before Jupiter Ascending, the Wachowskis had a mixed record with large-scale projects. While V for Vendetta (which they wrote and produced) was a success, films they directed like Speed Racer (2008) and Cloud Atlas (2012) were also ambitious, visually distinct films that polarized critics and struggled at the box office. This history established them as visionary but commercially unpredictable filmmakers.
An Overly Complicated Narrative
One of the most frequent criticisms leveled against Jupiter Ascending was its dense and often confusing plot. The story follows Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis), a humble house cleaner who discovers she is the genetic reincarnation of an intergalactic queen. This revelation thrusts her into the center of a conflict between three powerful alien siblings who wish to control Earth.
The narrative is filled with extensive exposition about galactic bureaucracy, genetic dynasties, and interstellar property rights. Instead of a thrilling adventure, much of the film is dedicated to explaining complex rules and political structures. This focus on convoluted lore came at the expense of character development, leaving audiences with little emotional connection to the central figures.
Character and Performance Issues
The film's protagonists also failed to resonate with viewers. Jupiter Jones was criticized for being a largely passive character, often reacting to events rather than driving them. Despite the story positioning her as a savior, she is frequently rescued by Caine Wise (Channing Tatum), a genetically engineered soldier with wolf DNA.
The performances of the lead actors were described as uninspired. Critics noted a lack of on-screen chemistry between Kunis and Tatum, which undermined the film's central romance. Additionally, Eddie Redmayne's performance as the primary antagonist, Balem Abrasax, was widely singled out for its unusual and often whispered delivery, which many found distracting rather than menacing.
A Critical Failure
According to review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, Jupiter Ascending has an approval rating of just 27% based on 276 reviews. The site's critical consensus reads, "Pleasing to the eye but narratively confused, Jupiter Ascending delivers another visually thrilling misfire from the Wachowskis."
Financial Disappointment at the Box Office
With its final production budget estimated to be as high as $210 million, not including marketing costs, Jupiter Ascending needed to be a global blockbuster to turn a profit. The film's release date was pushed back from summer 2014 to February 2015, a move often interpreted as a lack of studio confidence.
Upon release, the film's box office numbers were underwhelming. It grossed only $47.4 million in North America and $136.5 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $183.9 million. When factoring in the additional costs for global marketing and distribution, industry analysts estimate the film resulted in a loss of over $100 million for the studio.
"Time is the single most precious commodity in the universe."
This line from the film was ironically quoted by some reviewers, who felt the movie's 127-minute runtime was a poor use of their own time. The financial failure made it one of the biggest box office bombs of 2015.
A Visual Spectacle Lacking Substance
Despite its narrative shortcomings, one aspect of Jupiter Ascending that received consistent praise was its visual design. The Wachowskis and their creative team constructed a detailed and imaginative universe, featuring breathtaking cityscapes, unique spacecraft designs, and impressive action sequences. The special effects were considered top-tier and showcased the directors' flair for creating stunning visual experiences.
However, these impressive visuals were not enough to save the film. Many critics and viewers felt that the spectacle was hollow, serving a story that was neither engaging nor emotionally resonant. The film serves as a case study in how technical achievement alone cannot compensate for fundamental weaknesses in script and character.
Legacy and Availability
Today, Jupiter Ascending is remembered as a cautionary tale about the risks of high-budget, original filmmaking in a franchise-dominated industry. It represents an ambitious creative swing that, despite its creators' pedigree, failed to find its audience. While it has developed a small cult following among those who appreciate its unique aesthetic and imaginative scope, it remains largely defined by its critical and financial failure.
For those interested in watching the film, Jupiter Ascending is not currently available on major subscription streaming services. It can be rented or purchased digitally through several online platforms, including:
- YouTube
- Amazon Prime Video
- Apple TV+
- Fandango at Home